What's the Big Deal About Being Overqualified?
Scouting through job listings, you spot a position in your field. The prospective employer is looking for somebody with a bachelor’s degree and four years of relevant experience. Having a master’s degree and seven years under your belt, you hurry to apply, figuring that your higher credentials will at least score an interview.
But your phone never rings.
Instead of working to your advantage, being overqualified for a job can be a red flag that keeps employers from wanting to know you better. While it may be difficult to overcome their objectives, knowing the basis for their concerns can help make your job search more fruitful (and perhaps make rejection more palatable).
The money issue
When Charlotte Tomic moved to Florida about three years ago, she applied for various junior public-relations positions because of the lack of openings for senior professionals in her field. Due to the experience shown on her résumé, she found employers weren’t interested.
“There’s never even been a discussion except for one job where I was actually offered the position,” Tomic says. “They said they knew I was overqualified, but they needed help. I was willing to take the job, but it made no sense because of the salary. It wasn’t paying enough to leave my freelance solo practice.”
Money is a key reason people work. Even if you are willing to settle for a lower salary because of the tough economy, employers worry that you will jump ship as soon as you find another position offering compensation more in line with what you are used to earning.
Other strikes against the overqualified
According to Duncan Mathison, co-author of “Unlock the Hidden Job Market: Six Steps to a Successful Search When Times Are Tough,” hiring managers ask themselves three questions:
- Does the person have the ability and skills to do the job?
- Is the applicant motivated to do the job in that it meets her needs, interests and values?
- How will this candidate fit into the group, the organizational structure and culture?
While you clearly may have the skills, a lower job means that the number of competitors who are also qualified is greater than if you were applying for a higher position. The sheer number in the applicant pool can work against you.
Likewise, Mathison says, “Questions two and three could work against you because the hiring manager will assume on the long term the lower-level job will not meet your needs or you won’t fit into the structure. The manager might also feel threatened if you are qualified to do his job.”
Easing fears — and getting hired
Ford Kanzler of El Granada, Calif., has been told that he was overqualified many times during his 30-plus years in technology public-relations management. In one instance, though, he was able to turn that potential negative to his advantage.
“I told the hiring manager, ‘I agree. I’m more than qualified for the job, but that means I’ll be able to come in, hit the ground running, create desired results in a short time and require virtually zero management. I can operate as your wing man, and together we can really get the job done fast and well.’” Kanzler landed the job and worked for the company for several years.
Mathison agrees that sometimes it pays to get the issue on the table and ask the prospective employers if they see any pluses to your candidacy based on your higher qualifications. “Tell them that you too had concerns that the job might not be a fit but applied because factors beyond the title were important to you. Promise that if at any point you feel the job appears too low or not one where you will bring the full engagement needed to excel in the position, you will withdraw your candidacy. Your willingness to walk away tells them you are motivated if you stay in the game.”
Tailor your résumé
Finally, remember that a good application for any position should be created to match the employer’s needs as closely as possible. While experts generally don’t recommend lying or “dumbing down” a résumé, simple (yet truthful) changes can make you a more desirable candidate.
A few edits to consider:
- Changing terminology, if appropriate (for example, “manager” can become “project team leader” to match the language of the job description).
- Shortening years of service by dropping early jobs if the years sound too long.
- Toning down executive-sounding titles, especially if inflated (for example, calling yourself by a managerial title rather than showcasing that you were vice president in a company with only five employees).
- Dropping a degree in favor of an “Additional Professional Training” statement describing topics on which you have advanced knowledge.
Hopefully, the result will be the greatest change of all — a foot in the door.
Beth Braccio Hering, CareerBuilder Writer

July 6th, 2010 at 1:26 pm
I would like to comment on your article because it really hits home for me. I have experienced being both over-qualified for jobs and under-qualified for jobs. I must agree that managers will look at a person’s qualifications and view that an over-qualified individual will move to another job if the pay scale is more in line with what he or she expects from his or her experience level. It is a shame but it does happen and also drives the pay rate down to pay substantial in third world countries. I wish that managers would hire over-qualified individuals to keep them working and improve the work provided by these outstanding men and women.
July 6th, 2010 at 3:59 pm
If you have a BS you can’t just back off and say you have a 2 year degree if you don’t, and dropping the 4 year degree off your resume would leave you under qualified.
July 6th, 2010 at 4:11 pm
It’s a sham. Now some hiring managers are protecting their turf for fear of losing their jobs to a better candidate. Some engage in stalling the interview process, making themselves “busy” to stay engaged in their job and eliminating “over-qiualified” candidate using management over-ride. Like some financial advisors, they don’t have their employer’s interest at heart. Why does everybody thinks hiring managers are dedicated and do the right thing. They are humans and like everybody else engage in office politics. Their prime objective is to survive the cut during economic hardtimes. Employers should realize that this malpractice by hiring managers caused US competitiveness to be substandard when compared to international mkt. Why do we assume hiring managers are doing a good job? It appears they are held to a low standard and get away with substandard services. In foreign job mkt, there is no such thing as over-qualified b/cos they have the right attitude. The purge should begin with hiring managers, They contribute to the failure of US companies to compete globally by this practice.
July 6th, 2010 at 5:36 pm
I have always hired the top qualifications because they produce more while they are with me and teach their skills to others, and me.
I also train train train.
Some say you train them and they leave. Well I fear if I do not train they will stay, and stay… well you know.
I once hired a BSME in a mechanic position waiting for a proper slot to open up and ended up with one of the best men on the team. He aproached the job as an engineer and was a world of help. I was able to use his performance to get him several raises and moved him into the office before an engineering slot was avaliable.
I also have experience with a EE as an instrument tech. Good man.
Sometimes people just want to drop back for what ever reason or relize they prefer to get their hands dirty or not have the hassel of a higher level position.
The higher I go the less fun work is.
But I can’t seem to land what is now, at this point in my career, the ‘perfect job’ due to the progressive sucess rate I have enjoyed.
July 6th, 2010 at 10:18 pm
Why in the world would you ever tell someone to drop a degree from their resume? That degree not only represents a lot of time and financial investment but more importantly it represents knowledge. Something is really wrong with society if we have now gotten to the point where we encourage people to say they are less educated than what they are.
July 6th, 2010 at 10:50 pm
Thank you, Teri T, for telling the truth that hiring managers are not the be-all and end-all! I just had an interview with a non-profit and the interviewers were not sophisticated, nor experienced in interviewing. No eye contact, rote questions asked from a list, no spontaneity. Sigh. I have years of experience and education, but I never consider myself over-qualified because every position has a learning curve and has required that I learn new skills in order to perform. My present boss makes a point of hiring people with a different skills set from hers because she says she needs to grow her organization, not stagnate it. Bravo!
July 7th, 2010 at 1:40 am
Lisa, these are facts not just the truth. I do investigative audits (and forensic accounting) and reviewed many documentations like exit interviews, resumes, applications, payroll and related documents. It’ no surprise some jobs keep appearing in the ad over and over to lure applications but in reality it does not exist or just gimmmicks to prolong the “existence” of the opening for someone’s benefits.
July 7th, 2010 at 8:06 am
Thanks for a great article that backs up what I ghave been telling students and colleagues for years. The great American myth is that higher education opens doors and is always desirable. The reality is that it opens one very specific door and slams shut all the rest. The only reason to get higher education is because you cannot do what you want to do without it. Getting a graduate degree because if you do not do it now you think you will never do it is a bad reason. Getting a graduate degree because Mom & Dad will pay for it if you do it now is a bad reason. Even getting a bachelors degree just to get a degree is the wrong reason. The degree should prepare you to do what you want to do. If you do not know, take the time to find out. After all you probably will be working for at least 50 years.
July 7th, 2010 at 10:12 am
Where do we stand those who only have BS and the rest of your piers have Masters? I was hired for lower salary due to recession. I learned a lot new things but I feel the working for underqualfied job is also not beneficial. The top managment assumes you are not qualified to take higher jobs. This is double trick situation. I am stucked in the same job for 5 years now. There were couple opening at work but I wasn’t called as a candidate. Most of the people who applied for these positions were unskilled.
I am working on MBA with a hope of brighter future. Should I stop or change careeres? I have a BS in Engineering.
Roberto
July 7th, 2010 at 11:49 am
First, Roberto, with all due respect, please proofread (spelling,punctuation) before you submit things in writing.Someone who is working on an MBA should be able to spell “careers”(no extra e, as well as know the difference between “piers” (where boats are docked & people fish from) vs.”peers” (one’s professional/social equals). Perhaps that is one issue that the top management (yes, there’s an “e” after “g”)holds against you, as a matter of speaking. So, if you say you are “stucked” (the word is “stuck”)in the same job, it may be a whole lot more than just your engineering skills that are being reviewed.
July 7th, 2010 at 12:36 pm
Here’s the thing: it really doesn’t matter (in the long run) if you are overqualified. All employers seem to care about these days is the “almighty dollar”! Training,knowledge, company culture-blah blah…There is NO sense of loyalty for demonstrating competency,dedication,experience. These qualities USED to be valued & appreciated by employers. NOW,all they care about is $, fire anyone at will, despite years of loyalty,& even go to desperate, unethical lengths to violate contracts(I know specific examples), just so they can hire someone for less $. Where’s the “reward” for doing one’s best, and using one’s skills/training, when all one gets for it is canned, in favor of a younger, cheaper person?! Employers expect one to come into a new company somehow already completely trained! How? Did you fall out of the sky just knowing? How else does one get experience, but in doing the actual job?!Yes, there are some basic skills, but as Lisa(above) mentioned, every new position has a learning curve. Employers need to actually respect & recognize that if they want to stay in business for the long run! No one is doing anyone favors. There’s give & take in all professional relationships.Common sense says:if you hire cheap & train poorly, you get whaat you deserve, & expect your business to fail!Money sure isn’t everything, but respect goes both ways! The bottom line is, even if one accepts a position that is technically “beneath” their qualifications, if the job is interesting, people are respectful, you can live,not just exist, on your salary, and the company culture is such that you truly feel your contributions are valued, then ANY JOB becomes a winning position! But one can never (be expected to) perform at their best level if one is always walking on eggshells, fearing the next round of layoffs-again.
July 8th, 2010 at 10:35 am
I absolutely agree with the comments here, especially those made by Leslie and Teri T. I have been out of work now for 3 years, and most recently, I have been applying for jobs that I am definitely overqualified for just to get back to work.
Recently, I applied for a part-time, customer service position with a large consumer products company in Northern NJ. I was interviewed (over the phone) by a person so young that I joked later that 20 years ago, I could have been changing her diapers! Yet, here she was, deciding whether I was “capable” of doing this job, even though I have worked with customers in one fashion or another for the past 20 years. She asked me within the first minute why I was applying for this job, so I was honest and said that I would just welcome the opportunity to get into a such a good company, and hopefully if I “proved myself” I might some day be considered for a full-time position. She immediately said, “There is no advancement in this position, nor will you ever be hired full-time by this company. Do you still want to talk?!” Of course I said yes, but I have to say, this wasn’t the first time I have been interviewed by a younger person who, in my opinion, seemed to be crossing a line in what they are saying to me in the interview. Yet, they are employed, and I am not! Needless to say, the rejection e-mail came not 2 minutes after I hung up the phone.
So, I agree with the posts that say that companies are getting EXACTLY what they are paying for. And I have been around long enough now to know that EVERYTHING in the workplace is about politics and as another post said, the almighty dollar.
Although it may sound like I am just some older, bitter individual, the truth is that I am sincerely worried about the future of our country – because we continue to allow competent people to remain out of work, all because of a company’s politics, greed – or just plain stupidity!
July 8th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
Linda V, I sympathize with you. The sweet young thing (SYT) that interviewed you lack discipline. Just wanna add this: “Be nice to the people on your way up b/cos you’ll meet them on your way down.” Someday, the SYT will definitely arrive at that junction.
Perhaps, this will be a learning curve for you. Office politic is mandatory but self-control should be exercised for survival. I hope with each interview you can get thru’ this and land a job you enjoy regardless of pay – You’ll do well if you enjoyed what you are doing. Good luck and best wishes always.
August 29th, 2010 at 2:20 am
Leslie,
I just wanted to comment on your response to Roberto. A little sensitivity and tolerance on your part would have been nice; based on his name and the syntax of his posting, it is safe to assume that he is a non-native speaker of English.
I know plenty of native English speakers (including those who are graduating from American HS and colleges today) who cannot communicate clearly, effectively, and correctly in written communications. In addition, typos are quite common, including in your own posting (“whaat”)! You also have some grammatical issues (FEWER dollars, not LESS, and when you use “one” you must follow with “one’s” or “his” rather than “their” or “you.” So before you pick apart someone’s ability to communicate in written communications, please make sure that you have a solid command of your language, and perhaps of a second language as well. Then you’ll be in a stronger position to be critical if you choose to ignore the content of his message, which, I felt was quite on target.
Roberto, maybe you should speak to your manager about career paths within your organization and let him/her know that you have higher aspirations. Also, get to know others in the company and network, network, network, letting them know about your skill set and what else you can do. This way, when an opportunity does arise, they will think of you. Good luck / Buena suerte / Boa sorte / Buona fortuna !
BTW, to those who are reading this posting, please forgive any typos, as I wrote this after 2AM and am a bit tired!
February 3rd, 2011 at 8:22 am
What does one do if they’ve been laid off and have not been able to find any suitable work for 18 months?
February 3rd, 2011 at 2:30 pm
I have to admit that when applying for certain positions I drop my MBA Degree based on the qualifications of the position.
I actually have two resumes, one with my MBA and the other with my BBA. I also keep an Excel file of the positions I’ve applied to so I will know what resume was sent. It really helps!