Overqualified? The Pros and Cons of Accepting a Job with Less Money or Prestige

The employment market is still extremely tough, even for highly skilled individuals. The level of competition among job seekers has caused many professionals to consider applying for positions for which they may consider themselves overqualified. Sometimes, this approach may seem like the only way to land a job at all.
But should you do the same? Following are some pros and cons to help you decide whether you should seek a position that may not offer the money or prestige of your former job.
Pro: You can make a mark
If you take a job that you may perceive as a step down from where your career had been, one thing is virtually guaranteed: You won’t be overlooked. Chances are you can bring valuable perspective, new ideas or suggestions for improvement to the role because of your professional experience. As a result, you’re likely to gain a higher level of visibility than you might otherwise. You might even be first in line for a promotion if the right opportunity emerges.
Accepting a staff position when you were formerly a manager also could help you build certain aspects of your skill set that have been underdeveloped or overlooked. For instance, if you’ve been in a leadership role for several years, you may not have had a chance to do hands-on work in your field for some time. This could expose you to technologies or processes that have evolved since you were last in an individual-contributor role. If you go back to a management role at a later date, this experience in the trenches can be invaluable.
Con: You might be bored
If you accept a less challenging or demanding position than you had before, you could quickly grow bored with the job. Be sure you’ll be comfortable and satisfied with less challenge and, likely, less reward.
Also keep in mind how your previous roles may affect your relationships with managers and co-workers. You may very well have more experience or more impressive credentials than your supervisor. Are you OK with being told what to do and how to do it, even if you feel more qualified than your supervisor to make decisions? Respect the chain of command, be open to others’ opinions and avoid bragging about your advanced qualifications if you want to establish solid working relationships within your team.
Pro: You may reignite your passion
In the middle of a busy career where you’ve always been focused on the next move up, a step down can give you a new perspective. Working in a capacity you haven’t for a while — programming again after moving far enough up the IT ladder that you were managing people instead of code, for example — can also give you fresh insight into what you enjoy most about your profession. You may even find, for instance, that you like programming more than managing others. Many people seek this kind of career change because it allows them to find a long-lost passion or improve their work/life balance.
Should you pursue a role for which you feel you may be overqualified? There’s no right or wrong answer, and in many cases it comes down to economics. It’s a complicated decision, and one that depends heavily on your personal situation and future career goals. Any experience is a learning experience, and weighing the pros and cons can help you make the right choice for you.
Con: You could set yourself back professionally
Prospective employers often do not hire workers with more experience than they seek because they worry these professionals will leave as soon as a better job offer comes along. If you are one of those people, you risk burning bridges with your new employer by confirming his initial fears about hiring you.
Consider also that employers look for a pattern of growth when hiring. Going backward a step or two could raise a red flag for future employers. They will likely understand that a difficult job market prompted you to accept the role, but just know that the topic will almost certainly come up.
Robert Half International is the world’s first and largest specialized staffing firm with a global network of 360 offices worldwide. For more information about our professional services, please visit www.roberthalf.com. For additional career advice, follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/roberthalf.

August 31st, 2010 at 2:22 pm
I’ve recently interviewed for positions that I knew I was overqualified for. The employers knew this too, and I didn’t get the jobs based on the cons entered above. Taking a job below my career level really isn’t an option.
August 31st, 2010 at 2:50 pm
i am in the automotive service management field, this is very true in this field.I can not become empolyed by other managers,because of my resume.If i dumb it down,I seem to old for the position avalible,what to do? I am 45 and in the Sacramento area,Scott
August 31st, 2010 at 3:28 pm
very good advice. i’m glad I read it.
August 31st, 2010 at 3:34 pm
There may be many more negatives than positives to taking a lower level position. However, speaking from experience, after being out of work for 2 1/2 years, I had no choice, as I needed a job.
August 31st, 2010 at 4:30 pm
I am in that exact situation right now. “On the fence”.
August 31st, 2010 at 4:50 pm
I definitely agree with you even though I haven’t thinking that way before. Your opinion was very helpful to me.
Thank you
August 31st, 2010 at 5:11 pm
I like this article, it was very interesting to read it. Thanks
August 31st, 2010 at 5:36 pm
I took a lower position with a 70% cut in pay. It lasted three weeks. It was very hard for me to be guided to do something the long way when I knew shortcuts and efficency. When I suggested those shortcuts to the person that was training me she didn’t like it and my assignment was cut short. My advice, if you take a lower position, keep your mouth shut, be humble, play dumb and have Patience…
August 31st, 2010 at 6:36 pm
I too was in the very same position and becoming very frustrated with the fact that I HAD to apply for positions I was over qualified for as that was all that was available…In desperation I finally told the interviewers that “even the over qualified have to eat”. I also sold my self as a bargain at half the price because who ever I worked for would soon be able to take on more responsibility as my work history and experience would lend itself to much support…Not only did I get the job, but they reviewed the job description, tailored it to suit me better and increased the pay by $5000 a year!
August 31st, 2010 at 6:44 pm
There are MANY factors to consider here, such as my age. Even though my age would give indication that I have a lot of life experience that brings value to any company, the fact is the company wants to pay minimal wages/salary at the start. So they are less likely to hire someone older like me. Then, for me, there is the educational piece. I’ve gone ALL the way and have a Ph.D., which also tends to scare prospective employers off, so many times they don’t even call me for an interview, they just ignore my application, even though I may hide my education deep inside as possible. Another factor for me is that my wife and I began an S-Corp, so I’m the CEO (and do the work of all other C-levels). That in itself is a deterrant, so I’ve dumbed that down by just saying I’m an entrepreneur/business owner. We have two dba businesses under the same corporate umbrella. Though I dumb down my resume as much as possible, but yet keep myself open and honest, they can always read between the lines and figure out my approximate age and they dump me right then and there.
So I don’t get the chance to explain anything such as that we are in a financially good place without too many needs, PLUS I’ve lived the life of a business owner with all of its ups and downs (mostly downs) and am ready to settle into a position with a company that can offer stability in income as well as medical benefits that don’t come with business ownership.
I’m starting in a couple of weeks with a company within one mile of my house that is a HUGE step down for me and about half the pay I was hoping for. But it’s at least a job with steady pay and medical benefits (after being on the job for 90 days) PLUS they are giving me the chance. One other thought, is that once I get my foot in the door and establish my strong work ethic and display my experience in handling situations and people, that perhaps I might even be considered for any upper positions that may come open in the future!
August 31st, 2010 at 7:03 pm
Spelling simple words wrong like employed & writing to instead of too will raise a flag also….I don’t know how people become managers when they can’t spell or make grammatical errors…be sure this isn’t your problem!
August 31st, 2010 at 7:05 pm
I have a M.S. in Animal Physiology and a minor in Chemistry. I have deleted my M.S. degree on my resume’ because I’m tired of being told… “You’re over-qualified”. To me, the people who tell me this are afraid I may take their job or may not like the competition I would create for them!! Today – there is no such thing as putting the company’s needs first. It’s all about ME, ME and MY job security!!
August 31st, 2010 at 7:46 pm
The reallly tough part is convincing employers that you actually want a job that is a step down. After being in management for 35+ years, I am ready to step back and not have to worry about being in charge of everything and everyone. How do you say that in a way that doesn’t sound as if you are lazy?
August 31st, 2010 at 7:49 pm
I have been in the position of not hiring someone who was over qualified for the above reasons. Now I’m the one looking for a job. Good article.
August 31st, 2010 at 8:03 pm
I took a job at lower pay, fewer hours, because I was desperate. It was a great interpersonal experience but it set me back financially because it left me no time to eke out some higher paid work or upgrade my education. I too am on the fence at the moment as it was a grant-funded “seasonal” job and was put on unemployment at the beginning of the summer with the request by my employer that I plan to return in September. In retrospect this was a bad idea on many professional and financial levels. Like RC “on the fence” now. Hardest part is that interpersonally it was an awesome job so I feel even worse if I do not return.
August 31st, 2010 at 8:22 pm
I have an MBA and just got offered a job making $12.50 an hr. I initially accepted it but then changed my mind, I just couldn’t figure out how to live off $12.50/hr which is less than my unemployment. I know unemployment will end soon but what do you do???
August 31st, 2010 at 8:33 pm
I’ve been out of work since April. Was imployed as a design and layout engineer in an industry that is very specialized. I’m finding that I’m either over qualified or don’t meet the requirements. I have also come to feel that at age 59 no one wants to take a chance on hiring me.
August 31st, 2010 at 8:39 pm
Good timing. I took this job as a supervisor when I’m qualified for plant management. I just told my boss why everyone out on the floor was mad and what he should be doing about it. He said he “didn’t need me telling him how to do his job.” It’s not going well here. I should keep my mouth shut before I end up back out in the un-employment line.
August 31st, 2010 at 8:45 pm
Sometimes you do have to take a few steps backwards to get to where you really want to be.
August 31st, 2010 at 8:55 pm
Con…If you take a lower paying position, it will have an adverse effect on your unemployment dollars during your next layoff; it also has an impact on your social security earnings. The bottom line…Going back is definitely not the way to go unless you’re ready to retire or give up looking for a good career opportunity.
August 31st, 2010 at 8:57 pm
I was underpaid and underappreciated for the skills that I had with my last employer for over 13 years, I finally threw in the towel and not only left that employer but left the state. I started looking for work in the same field before I even left, and after three weeks in my new home I was not getting any responses except that I was not chosen for the positions that I was more than qualified. I finally started applying outside of my former field, similar profession and got way more responses. I finally got a job so far from my previous field and pay, bu the bosses asked me extensively and repeatedly if I was sure this step down in pay and skill was ok. this is the first time I have felt overappreciated and underpaid!! I just hope they mean it when they say that I should climb up their ladder quickly if my actual skill level is as impressive as my resume and references!!
August 31st, 2010 at 9:18 pm
I recently interviewed for a position I’m overqualified for and the interviewer verbally attacked me with heavy skepticism and lots of eye rolling. Mentioning the cons. I kept my composure but I drove away feeling very angry with his brutal honesty and childish eye rolling. It’s tough out here with the level competition out here and skepticism from interviewers for these entry level jobs.
August 31st, 2010 at 9:27 pm
I was making $31.00/hr on my previous employer. I’ve been out of work for the last 12 months and was turned down job after job because of overqualified so to speak.
Any sggestions how best to approach this dilemma?
August 31st, 2010 at 9:43 pm
After moving into a new area, a job is no longer a want..it is a need. I have applied to several companies with all noting that I am overqualified. Managers look @ my accomplishments and run for the hills. One even told me that she didn’t want me taking her job. So where is the middle ground? Darned if I do and darned if I don’t. I have accepted a job that required NO RESUME just a generic application and I am so unhappy. Working for a manager that has no clue is a terrible place to be =(
August 31st, 2010 at 10:17 pm
I certainly attest that taking now, two jobs that I have been overqualified for has not been a great experience. Despite the best attempts to fulfill the role that you were hired to do, your skills, education and experience can exceed the persons for which you report to and can be very threatening as well. This job market is tough. Basically, you just “dummy up”.
August 31st, 2010 at 10:37 pm
I’ve dumbed down my resume before, too, but didn’t have any luck that way. However, somewhere after I gave up this tack, I was offered a job well below my experience, but since my other half had a job, I could afford to take the chance. It offered me the chance to rebuild my morale so when a more-apropos position came up – several months later – I was well-equipped while not having as big a gap on my resume to explain.
August 31st, 2010 at 10:53 pm
Been there and done that, will not do it again (I Hope). It took me years to even get near where I had been. Working as staff was not the problem, it is actually fun playing with the toys again. The problem is management, they know you are ex management and normally see you as a threat. They also look at you as someone who will jump ship as soon as you find another position. You don’t have the creative feature of the job as staff. Being able to design systems and offices is the best part of what I do.
August 31st, 2010 at 10:53 pm
The best way to take a job that you are overqualified for is to take a job in a slightly different field, instead of exactly the same field. Not only can it broaden your skill set, but it may possibly be interesting, or even fun. And most experience is useful in other jobs, unless perhaps your only skill is designing embedded processors.
August 31st, 2010 at 11:07 pm
I am in the same position and I agree with all of you and the article. I would take less money I just want to be able to work in my field. Which is information techology. I have been out of work for the last 6 months and when seeking a position the money and experience seems to ruin the opportunity. I have years of experenice in the software industry and my degree. Although, I believe that the hiring managers need to lower expectations as well they all seem to want experts in every field. Well if you have all the expertise I would think that the money and benefits would be included. But it’s not and if one is overqualified why would you want to not pay the person to stay on… Seems hopeless.
August 31st, 2010 at 11:31 pm
I have been interviewing for every position in which I qualify. Itbis getting very frustrating being called ” overqualified”, even though I am willing and able to do the job. I don’t get a chance, even when I can offer so much more to the position. How to get past this hurdle?
August 31st, 2010 at 11:54 pm
I am an unemployed restaurant manager. I believe I have been turned down for jobs because of seeming overqualified. I would be more than happy to work for less than I was making, but I think alot of hiring mgrs see my resume and don’t believe I’m serious. I used to turn down potential ee’s for the same reason, I didn’t want to invest the time and money in training them if I thought they were just taking the job temporarily until they found a better job.
September 1st, 2010 at 12:16 am
yeah. I’ve definatley applied for several jobs I feel I’m over qualified for, but what are you going to do? It’s not like jobs grow on trees these days. There’s alot to be said for humility. Even more so when you aren’t contacted for those jobs that are “under” you.
September 1st, 2010 at 12:19 am
Companies have the upper hand today. I have been out of work 3 1/2 years (research chemist, NE Ohio, now 59 yrs old). I just want to work in the lab, money is a minor factor to me, but can’t get employers to see that, and the age bias.
September 1st, 2010 at 12:47 am
Several years ago, after being out of work for nearly a year and with some 30 years experience, I accepted a junior software engineering position. My supervisor quickly recognized my experience and within 2 years, I was back in a lead position. This one worked out for me but I also know that my experience has been a red flag for many interviews. I would not recommend taking a junior position.
September 1st, 2010 at 1:36 am
I have applied for many jobs for which I am clearly over-qualified. I have not received a single response from these employers. Even if I were to engage in conversations/ interviews, there are so many disadvantages that I don’t know if I would seriously entertain an offer. However, as Jeff K above mentioned, when you’ve run out of all reserves, low pay is better than no pay!@
September 1st, 2010 at 8:47 am
I highly doubted that this information would work for me. But I really needed a job. I had been working up the ladder for a long time to become a recognized excort. But due to the downfall of economy, our business got a bad hit and I lost my job. Being a jobless single mom brings up a lot of challenges and hence I had to start out on the streets of LA as a hooker again. That was my short story. But the truth behind it is now I am back to the wild and I am loving every moment of it.
Terra
September 1st, 2010 at 9:55 am
Try looking at it this way. If you can, evaluate the company itself. Is it growing, is it large enough where you would be able to move upwards, if so, go for it.
September 1st, 2010 at 10:18 am
I think it’s fine to land a job you like regarless of being overqualified or underqualified.
I have been as postdoc for 8 years and like science since very yong, but finally get sick of doing research. I was laid off from a lab in dfci/harvard last year, guessing because the conclusions of the projects were negative, just don’t want to do something against my faith on science. Science is so rigged nowdays!
September 1st, 2010 at 10:28 am
This is exactly the position I also find myself in.
Employers need to start taking their own advice and think a little out of the box. We hear all the time how much money it costs to train someone new into a position. Someone overqualified would likely take less time & effort to fit into the same position.
Nothing’s going to change with the current job market until employers start changing how they look at prospects.
September 1st, 2010 at 10:34 am
These a all valid points. One more that I am encountering:
Jobs that I have been applying for have the same title and workload as before. Only difference? The pay is only half. So- employers are looking for someone to do the same amount of work for half the price. They know people are getting desperate, so please beware!
September 1st, 2010 at 10:45 am
I have had the reverse experience of what you have suggested.
I have advanced degrees and have been in a management position for a long time and have not been able, irregardless of my efforts, to get hired in a lower level job after 2 years of looking.
I think employers hesitate to hire someone who is too overqualified for the con reasons that you mentioned.
September 1st, 2010 at 10:51 am
After 20 years in technology sales/marketing I changed to accounting 8 years ago. It’s a more stable field with more opportunities in my town. Pay is lower. The article had very good pointerss and I have experienced them all and learned from my mistakes.
September 1st, 2010 at 1:40 pm
This is nothing new…I’ve been hearing “overqualified” since the 1970s when I was in my 20′s and applying for lower level positions. I’m still hearing it today at 56!!! Deleting academic and employment achievements are rather extreme…just leave them on the resume!!! It’s an employer’s market and we have to live with it!!!
September 1st, 2010 at 1:42 pm
The current job market is very tough. I have been out of full-time work for over a year now and have applied for jobs I am over qualified for and had only 3 interviews. Employers seem to be more concerned about their financia bottom line and that often does not include paying more for more experienced employees.
September 1st, 2010 at 3:31 pm
I think it’s a joke, being “over-qualified”. I’ve been an electrician for 20 years, and have yet to meet anyone in this dangerous field who has “too much” credential. Can you imagine a surgeon being denied his or her next career move because of his or her “over-qualifications”? It is obvious that as C.E.O. salaries increase from 6 to 7 figures/year, inversely, blue collar salaries are shamefully cut by half.
I’ve been out of work for 2 years now and decided to become a product of the latest trend-more credentials. I now am a state-certified electrical contractor/master electrician and have my own company.
Would I hire someone in my business who thought they were “over-qualified”? You bet.
September 1st, 2010 at 9:16 pm
I agree with VK. I quit my old job and took a few months off. A friend of mine told me about an opportunity at her company. I applied, and got the position. I am in the same field but it was much lower in pay. I have been working a month now, and I am being worked to the bone. Long hours, more work and not really loving it. I know I won’t stay a long time, because of the paycheck. That is how the Corporate world works these days. A whole lot of work for very little pay. I am thankful I am employed, but I am keeping my eyes open. I probably would stay if they would compensate for the knowledge and the experience. I have always heard…It is a lot easier finding a job when you have a job. We will see. Until it changes, it is best to just mass produce and let it go.
September 2nd, 2010 at 11:35 pm
I have my Doctorate degree. I lied on my app and said I had a Masters since I was tired of getting interviews that seemed to be arranged only so the hiring entities could say they had interviewed someone with their PhD. They never took me seriously. I finally got a job (for which I am gratful) that pays less than unemployement but does give me insurance. But it has impeded my ability to find “that” job. And another con – if you are over qualified you have been socialized differently. It is very difficult to adjust. But in this economy it is a job and I am grateful. Will I stay with this company? Not sure. It is not a company I would have chosen to work for in the past but they were kind enough to hire me when no one could be bothered to even look at my resume’ so, who knows?
September 3rd, 2010 at 10:33 am
Until 30 days ago I had been unemployed since November. During that time I interviewed for jobs at my level and jobs at a lower level. Overqualification was an issue for some of the employers, but eventually I was offered such a position for significantly less money, which I accepted for financial reasons. However, had I not taken it I would not yet be employed. That job arose suddenly and I was hired quickly, because of my experience. I don’t know how it will turn out, but for me, at that point in time a job in hand was worth two in the bush. I do have credibility in my new position, but I still have to prove myself. I now may have an opportunity to move into a higher level position that opened up unexpectedly, which I didn’t see coming before being hired. There are also benefits to being in a lower level position–I can work fewer hours and have less responsibility, which offers another benefit that ultimately may be worth the cost and improve my quality of life. Perhaps everything is a trade-off.
September 5th, 2010 at 2:59 pm
The economy is unlikely to improve in any sustainable way until the government quits interfering. Stimulus payments and all the other bs don’t produce any wealth. I’ve been out of work for a year and I’m trying to make it on my own by doing a small business and taking small jobs, but it’s tough. On a positive note, the economic crisis should force people to look at the nature of government and it’s contribution to this mess. Government just moves money around and saddles businesses with regulation. Unfortunately, neither major party will admit to this and so things are not likely to change come November.
September 16th, 2010 at 3:15 pm
I am an RHIT (Registered Health Information Technologist); I got an offer for a part-time Medical Billing Specialist position, which pays $15.45 per hour.
I initially wanted to accept it because this is a great opportunity to work at a top clinic in my area. However, I find I am changing my mind because it is only working part-time, 25-30 hours per week, most night and weekends, with no benefits…
I just could not figure out how $15.50/hr, which is $300.00 more then I am living on, with my unemployment and MinnesotaCare, is worth losing both benefits.
I want too ask for more money and need benefits because I will loose my unemploymen and MinnesotaCare for over income.
This could be a chance to further my career, and I am afraid that if I ask for benefits and more money, I will not even get my foot in the door.
September 20th, 2010 at 9:48 am
yes, the pros and cons are true, but also simplistic and common sensical. Even on a “talking head roundtable” on PBS featuring 4 experts, including the Dolans – a 51 year olf degreed civil engineer had posted over 800 resumes and covers with the usual responses. He had a family and his unemployment ran out – The Dolans (husband and wife team nationally syndicated financial advice team) told him to STOP looking for full time because no one is hiring any due to expansive regulation cost for busineses to do so (I know this for a fact, I would not hire a full timer ever again) – they said he is much better off getting 2 or 3 part time positions, as they are now getting benefits as well (I also know this because I have also been looking and have posted 300+ resumes) – Simply, if McDonald’s wants to hire a PHD to push the french fry button, they can easily. I am now self employed working at least 7 jobs as needed, but the banks want to see a steady income, even if part before they will even talk to you about loans, re-fi, mods, loss mitigation, short sell/buy etc. Pinellas county now has over 18,000 homeless, a 38,000 home eviction list etc in court backlog and additionally last year was the record for the US with 96,000+ families being put on the curb – 25% over last year.
I went to the county workforce help office, and also worked with three recruiters and they all said the same thing – “wow, this is not the average resume, if you want to have a prayer of landing anything, you’ll need to “stupid” your resume severely”. Oh boy – I applied through one of them to a job that was a 207% perfect match, and I would have been productive my very first step in the door – it was as if they wrote the “position available” ad by stealing the words directly from my resume. They turned it down and I talked to the recruiter after to see if she might just be able to get me an interview, I could do the rest. She called the company back and they told her they haven’t had much luck with “prima donnas” and in her opinion that translated into fear that I would outperform all of them and wrinkle the “zone of comfort” they had built and existed in now. Against all HR and sensical logic, it was obvious the reverse would happen and I could have easily doubled the revenue every year-over resulting in additional job security for all of them.
Now I have 4 different resumes, from factual to “extremely stupid” depending on job applying for and am looking at anything anywhere – there are jobs down the center of the country, but I’m not ready to move to the middle of North Dakota – Very frustrating indeed – getting closer and closer to planning a fresh “do-over in another country” – as US citizens are leaving in record rates, and not military or disabily. SS checks being mailed offshore to retired people only, have reached an all time high (easily verified) and now number more than 28 of our own states – Costa Rica getting the most.
Good luck all, Just next time the helicopter dropping monopoly money swings by, I hope I’m underneath it
September 20th, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Overqualified can be good or bad you are right,I have had more times where it has been bad. Many jobs don’t want to hire someone overqualified because they know when a better job comes around they are going to quit and take it.
September 30th, 2010 at 2:53 am
In a similar situation. I know I can help the fast-growing start-up company I am working for (as an over-qualified employee) further organize and achieve efficiencies that will help everyone concerned. However; although I can tell my boss values my input, he is hardly around and I need to work very closely with his other direct reports. I have encountered a lot of resistance from these colleagues, and I have noticed it’s a way of undermining any initiative that did not come from them. I am now thinking that it will be very difficult for me to ever get into any other opportunity, and this is the one advantage I thought I could get from stepping down and working for a start up. If I get assertive, I know I will be sacrificing my relationships there. So, I would say that if you can avoid working under your experience, you should avoid it at all costs, unless you have a firm agreement up front that you will be promoted or given a better opp within a reasonable amount of time. If money is an issue which is the case for many of us, at this point I ponder if it would not be better to simply switch careers. There is a loss of dignity and self-respect that comes from settling for less. I also think the reason some employers take advantage of the situation is that they know that there will be candidates that will cave in and take less. If we were not willing to take less even in hard circumstances, I think employers would be forced to get more creative with their own corp structures, etc. I think that one of the saddest commentaries about our country’s economic and unemployment situation is that even with so many people being unemployed, there are are still too many salaries that really do not merit being so high. The top layers have not been much affected. Wouldn’t it be nice if employers who handsomely pay their executives could offer to mitigate the unemployment rate by reducing top company executives’ salaries to make room for more positions within their companies? This may be utopia, but for as long as candidates are willing to settle for less, some will continue to get richer while more continue to struggle.